|
Hate
and persecution come in many forms.
We hear much of it on the news in relation to the
Middle East, Saddam Hussein, Osama bin Laden, and
other terrorists. Recently, homegrown hatred focused
on Mormonism has been in the spotlight with the Elizabeth
Smart kidnapping, subsequent arrests and the recent
release of the book, 'Under the Banner of Heaven'
by Jon Krakauer. Most of us think we have very little
in common with these situations and people, and, on
the large scale, we most likely don't. But on a smaller
scale, how do we respond to hate in our own lives?
How do we treat people who wrong us? Do we think unkind
thoughts or shun the childless and divorced? Do we
not include those that are less popular and avoid
all those not of our faith and way of thinking? How
do we really deal with those that hate and persecute
us?
President Gordon B. Hinckley said, "We
live in a society that feeds on criticism. Faultfinding
is the substance of columnists and commentators,
and there is too much of this among our own people.
It is so easy to find fault, and to resist doing
so requires much discipline…The enemy of
truth would divide us and cultivate within us
attitudes of criticism which, if permitted to
prevail, will only deter us in the pursuit of
our great divinely given goal. We cannot afford
to permit it to happen." We cannot give
in to feelings and demands to criticize. Once
we do, how much more slippery the slope becomes.
When faced
with those among us who would like to persecute us
for our beliefs, there are several points to remember.
The first of these would be to recall the eleventh
article of faith which says, "We claim the privilege
of worshipping Almighty God according to the dictates
of our own conscience, and allow all men the same
privilege, let them worship how, where, or what they
may." This idea we believe and accept as part
of our articles of faith seems to follow another great
document, The Constitution of the United States. The
First Amendment reads, "Congress shall make no
law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting
the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom
of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people
peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government
for a redress of grievances." These two ideas
push towards an idea of, not only religious freedom,
but also one of patience and tolerance.
Many
people believe that if we are fully tolerant and truly
accept and love others it is a betrayal of our beliefs,
that we are in essence condoning the wrongful behavior.
That simply is not so. If we look to Christ as our
example, we see time and time again when he love the
sinner, but hated the sin.
Russell
M. Nelson, at the April 1994 General Conference
discussed the differences between tolerance and
to tolerate. "…We must recognize
at the outset that there is a difference between
tolerance and tolerate. Your gracious tolerance
for an individual does not grant him or her license
to do wrong, nor does your tolerance obligate
you to tolerate his or her misdeed. That distinction
is fundamental to an understanding of this vital
virtue." He
goes on to say how God loves everyone, but his
children fight and build walls of intolerance
with one another.
In
the early 1990's, the First Presidency and Quorum
of the Twelve issued this statement, "We
call upon all people everywhere to recommit themselves
to the time-honored ideals of tolerance and mutual
respect. We sincerely believe that as we acknowledge
one another with consideration and compassion
we will discover that we can all peacefully coexist
despite our deepest differences."
The
second point to remember is to not engage in anything
that would be considered bashing, that is to tear
down one another, beliefs and ideas in a negative
way.
Marvin
J. Ashton said, "Some think the only
way to get even, to get attention or advantage,
or to win is to bash people. This kind of behavior
is never appropriate. Oftentimes character and
reputation and almost always self-esteem are destroyed
under the hammer of this vicious practice."
He then explains that charity is more than visiting
the sick and serving the needy. "Charity
is accepting someone's differences, weaknesses,
and shortcomings; having patience with someone
who has let us down; or resisting the impulse
to become offended when someone doesn't handle
something the way we might have hoped. Charity
is refusing to take advantage of another's weakness
and being willing to forgive someone who has hurt
us." ("The Tongue Can Be a Sharp
Sword" Ensign, May 1992)
Bashing
not only happens religiously, but politically as well.
When
we are given the right to vote and speak our minds,
do we bury our heads in the sand, or take on an attitude
of contempt for policy and politics and complain about
the world we live in or do we actively participate
in government and arm ourselves with information about
the issues? Do we participate in discussions rather
than debates? Dietrich Bonhoeffer, a Protestant martyr,
wrote from prison, "There is a very real danger
of our drifting into an attitude of contempt for humanity.
We know full that it would be very wrong, and that
it would lead to a sterile relationship with our fellow
men…the man who despises others can never hope
to do anything with them."
It is also important to remember
to have a forgiving spirit. There
are those that have immense ill will and resentment
towards member of the Church or others in their lives
that have caused them hurt and pain. We need to reach
out in love and forgiveness to those who wish to spew
venom at us. H. Burke Peterson, in the November 1983
Ensign, said, "Forgiveness of others for wrongs-imaginary
or real-often does more for the forgiver than for
the forgiven…The human soul seldom reaches such
heights of strength or nobility as when it removes
all resentments and forgives error or malice."
In Alma 5:30-31, it says, "…is there one
among you that doth make a mock of his brother, or
that heapeth upon him persecutions? Woe unto such
an one, for he is not prepared, and the time is at
hand that he must repent or he cannot be saved!"
For those that hold different beliefs than we do,
whether those beliefs are religious, political or
something else, we need to follow the plan laid out
for us. The plan of respect and tolerance, kindness
and charity; our greatest example being Jesus Christ.
In Our Search for Happiness, it states, "All
of our interpersonal relationships should be built
on a foundation of mutual respect, trust, and appreciation.
But that shouldn't prevent us from sharing deeply
held religious feelings with each other. Indeed, we
may find that our…differences add flavor and
perspective to our relationships, especially if those
relationships are built on true values, openness,
respect, trust, and understanding. Especially understanding."
|
Some
Inspired Words
"We
are Christians. We want the whole world to know that
we are. Sometimes we are accused of not being Christians,
but such is not the case. In the words of the great
prophet Nephi, "… we talk of Christ, we
rejoice in Christ, we preach of Christ, we prophesy
of Christ, and we write according to our prophecies,
that our children may know to what source they may
look for a remission of their sins." (2 Ne. 25:26.)
We look to Christ as the Author and Finisher of our
faith. He is our Redeemer."
Hartman Rector Jr., "Our Witness
to the World," Ensign, July 1972, 64
"Those
men and women who persist in publicly challenging
basic doctrines, practices, and establishment of the
Church sever themselves from the Spirit of the Lord
and forfeit their right to place and influence in
the Church. Members are encouraged to study the principles
and the doctrines of the Church so that they understand
them. Then, if questions arise and there are honest
differences of opinion, members are encouraged to
discuss these matters privately with priesthood leaders."
James E. Faust, "Keeping Covenants and Honoring
the Priesthood," Ensign, Nov. 1993, 36
"We
live at a time when old beliefs and old standards
are being challenged. The Church of which we are members
is being attacked on many sides. A few dissidents,
apostates, and excommunicants have marshaled their
resources in an effort to belittle and demean this
work-its history, its doctrine, its practices. Some
have stooped to falsehood, misrepresentation, and
mockery. A few weak ones have been taken in by their
sophistry.
There is another group presently receiving wide publicity
across the nation. They are poking into all the crevices
of our history, ferreting out little things of small
import and magnifying them into great issues of public
discussion, working the media in an effort to give
credibility to their efforts.
None of this is new, of course. From the day that
Joseph Smith walked out of the grove in the year 1820,
critics and enemies-generation after generation of
them-have worked and reworked the same old materials.
They have minutely explored the environment in which
Joseph Smith lived in an effort to rationalize-some
on the basis of folk magic and the occult-the remarkable
things which he did. Early in this fishing expedition,
one of them gathered affidavits from neighbors and
associates in an effort to undermine the character
of Joseph Smith. This old bale of straw has been dished
up again and again as if it were something new. They
have raked over every available word that he spoke
or wrote, and they then in turn have written long
tomes and delivered long lectures trying to explain
the mystery of his character and his work.
There have been cycles of this during the past 165
years. They have ebbed and flowed. Now we are in another
peak era, which also will pass.
As I have already mentioned, from the beginning of
this work there has been opposition. There have been
apostates. There have been scholars, some with balance
and others with an axe to grind, who have raked over
every bit of evidence available concerning Joseph
Smith, the prophet of this dispensation. I plead with
you, do not let yourselves be numbered among the critics,
among the dissidents, among the apostates. That does
not mean that you cannot read widely. As a Church,
we encourage gospel scholarship and the search to
understand all truth. Fundamental to our theology
is belief in individual freedom of inquiry, thought,
and expression. Constructive discussion is a privilege
of every Latter-day Saint.
But it is the greater obligation of every Latter-day
Saint to move forward the work of the Lord, to strengthen
His kingdom on the earth, to teach faith and build
testimony in that which God has brought to pass in
this, the dispensation of the fullness of times. Of
course, there are items in our history which, when
pulled out of context and highlighted, separated from
the time and the circumstances in which the events
took place, may raise some questions. Remember, however,
that no Church leader of whom I am aware, past or
present, has ever claimed perfection. They have been
and are human, including those who have served as
Presidents of the Church. The Lord has always used
those he has found most suitable for His purposes.
Notwithstanding some human weaknesses, they have accomplished
great and remarkable things, and this even while enemies
have been snapping at their heels. The work has moved
steadily and consistently forward, and the only losers
have been those who, in a spirit of criticism, which
usually has begun in a very mild and innocuous way,
have in some instances literally read, talked, and
written themselves out of the Church because they
looked only for the negative, read only the negative,
and discussed only the negative.
To all Latter-day Saints, I say, keep the faith. When
you study, do so with balance. Read the Book of Mormon
itself. Read it again and again. Ponder its beauty.
Reflect upon its many magnificent passages. Think
of the complexity of the detail of its historical
accounts. Pray about it, and the Holy Ghost will bear
record to you, as he has to me and to millions of
others, that it is the word of God, a voice crying
from the dust to this generation in declaration of
the divinity and the reality of the Lord Jesus Christ
as the living Son of the living God."
President, Gordon B. Hinckley
|